Bantu Holomisa and UDM vs Lebashe Investment Group: ConCourt judgment

Madondo AJ |

25 September 2022

Court finds that interim interdict the only appropriate remedy that could be granted to protect respondents’ rights


United Democratic Movement and Another v Lebashe Investment Group (Pty) Limited and Others

CCT 39/21

Date of hearing: 2 November 2021

Date of Judgment: 22 September 2022





The following explanatory note is provided to assist the media in reporting this case and is not binding on the Constitutional Court or any member of the Court.

On 22 September 2022 at 14h00, the Constitutional Court handed-down judgment in an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order of the Supreme Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Appeal struck off its roll the application by the applicants: United Democratic Movement (UDM) and Mr Bantubonke Harrington Holomisa for leave to appeal against the interim interdict granted by the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria (High Court) in favour of the first respondent, Lebashe Investment Group (Pty) Limited and the remainder of the respondents.